The fact that they mention other companies doesn't invalidate my point. Of all companies mentioned, a majority of time is spent speaking about Kobalt, it's foun

The fact that they mention other companies doesn't invalidate my point. Of all companies mentioned, a majority of time is spent speaking about Kobalt, it's founder and praising it. Kobalt gets around 6 paragraphs. Most other companies only get a paragraph each which only briefly describes what they don, and they aren't even all direct competitors. I have read the article and I'm miffed you'd suggest otherwise. Please read HN guidelines where it explicitly asks you not to suggest other posters haven't read the articles but to stick to the facts.