4 ms·
Definitely! I'm glad to see this is on other people's minds :) We're huge on backwards compatibility (and think everyone should be), which is why we don't wan
by jpochtar 9y ago
Definitely! I'm glad to see this is on other people's minds :)
We're huge on backwards compatibility (and think everyone should be), which is why we don't want to expose something we haven't stabilized yet. We'll have a way to export our just-before-codegen internal representation (shame on me for forgetting the PL term) once it settles down a bit. It's very much like a DOM, so there's not too much craziness there.
We'll be launching a bunch more backends in the coming weeks, so there's a good chance we'll have first-party support for your favorite framework anyway :)
- nojvek 9y agoWill be definitely be looking out for it. This is a great first minimum delightful product. Good job.