3 ms·
I would still trust a PhD in any field over some commercialized "artist". At least he went through the rigorous process of obtaining that degree. It changes peo
by rvo 9y ago
I would still trust a PhD in any field over some commercialized "artist". At least he went through the rigorous process of obtaining that degree. It changes people for the good, in my opinion.
- breuleux 9y agoMy general impression about PhDs voicing opinions in a different field than the one they have expertise in is that they are able to apply a veneer of eloquence and complexity to the uninformed nonsense they spout, whereas celebrities are more transparently stupid. I'm not sure which is worse. In any case, if you want a good idea of the state of the art, you should know better than to listen to either group at all. You have to listen to top academics in the relevant field, and hope they agree (because unfortunately, unless you become an expert yourself, you're not qualified to figure which top academics are right, if they happen to differ).
- rvo 9y agoCritical thinking is the most important tool for anyone, PhD or not. In this noisy world that we find ourselves in today, one MUST cultivate critical thinking skills. I don't trust phds because they "sound smart". Indeed, true smartness lies in simplifying complex concepts without much loss of information. I know the types of faux intellects you are referring to. Beware of them. I trust phds more because my prior on their ability to use critical thinking is much higher than a Hollywood dimwit who is paid to express emotions in people. It is still your job to trust, but verify. It is just easier to verify logically sound arguments or insights.