4 ms·
The answer I want is a clear explanation of these so called enlightenment values. What I'd also like is for you to stop putting words into my mouth, I never ad
by wsxcde 9y ago
The answer I want is a clear explanation of these so called enlightenment values.
What I'd also like is for you to stop putting words into my mouth, I never advocated for disregarding all knowledge generated before 1970, nor did I suggest that we must disassociate ourselves from anyone.
I just want to point out that the so called values of the enlightenment were never really put into practice. Rule of law and democracy didn't exist for African Americans or colonial citizens of color, the power of nonviolent protest and it's ability to effect change was mostly thanks to leaders who stood in opposition to those who supposedly represented the values of the enlightenment, and the relative peace of the last 60 years is a result of the devastation caused by great wars that were entered into by societies that were supposedly enlightened.
I'm just calling bullshit on the notion that the ideals of European nationalism fuelled by the industrial revolution can claim any credit for the social progress we've made as a nation. Technological progress? Sure. Social progress and justice? Not at all.
- psyc 9y agoWell it seems very simple to me. There were different aspects of the enlightenment. The most central one is probably reason over superstition. Some aspects are considered good now, some are not. Just make the distinctions; don't paint the whole thing according to its worst aspects and thinkers. What's the problem?