4 ms·
I don't think iskander though you were advocating using ML, but generally saying that the approaches _usually_ used in ML would not work in some datasets which
by ralmeida 9y ago
I don't think iskander though you were advocating using ML, but generally saying that the approaches _usually_ used in ML would not work in some datasets which are way too small.
A 12-point dataset is not desirable _per se_, but sometimes it's all one has - as is the case, for example in health-related research.
- cwyers 9y agoIn which case, you can't really afford train and test splits but you can look at approaches like leave-one-out to estimate what your sampling error looks like.
- jpeloquin 9y agoAnd, more generally, bootstrapping, which is a class of methods for re-sampling one's data in order to estimate uncertainty. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootstrapping_(statistics) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bootstrapping_(statistics)
- cwyers 9y agoI think leave one out is actually a special case of k-fold cross validation where k is equal to the number of datapoints. But yeah, you can use bootstrapping, cross validation, the jackknife. There's a large toolset there, and I trust an analyst who explains what motivated them to choose a certain tool rather than one who just uses a tool because it's what they always use or it's expected of them.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]