4 ms·
This is one area where I kinda hope open source doesn't have much success. OSS seems to struggle with UX and a poor UX in a car unit will get people killed. Sim
by curun1r 9y ago
This is one area where I kinda hope open source doesn't have much success. OSS seems to struggle with UX and a poor UX in a car unit will get people killed. Simply put, this kind of system needs to function almost entirely without the driver looking at the screen. The demo in the video fails hard at this. Android Auto and CarPlay are only non-nightmarish because the primary control mechanism is voice and they're integrated with steering wheel controls. Even then, they're likely to be too distracting for drivers to avoid accidents.
These kinds of systems need a lot of user testing with sophisticated eye tracking setups before we can feel comfortable letting the masses use them while driving. OSS developers just won't be able to afford that. Once cars are driving themselves, then I can see OSS entertainment units providing value. But as long as a human driver is responsible for not killing all the car's occupants and anyone who might come in (violent) contact with the outside of the car, there should be a high safety bar for these kinds systems and I'm not sure OSS will ever be able to clear that.
- toast0 9y agoHave you used a modern factory touchscreen head unit? They're pretty much unusable without looking either.
- aetherspawn 9y agoIn fairness they have big touch buttons and stuff placed in corners so you can quickly locate. The ones on this device are tiny and require visual interpretation to find. And I can’t see this getting steering wheel integration any time soon, so there’s more attention you have to pay it.
- Slansitartop 9y agoNot always. About 50% of the time I need to mess with bluetooth settings on my car because it paired to the wrong device. That involves navigating through at least three menus and hitting small-size buttons on the far side of the screen from the driver.