I prefer lxml.etree even for HTML on account of the parser. Either way, I don't understand what's not "for humans" about lxml. It provides a ton of simple and u

I prefer lxml.etree even for HTML on account of the parser. Either way, I don't understand what's not "for humans" about lxml. It provides a ton of simple and useful abstractions, is easy to learn, and is crazy robust and fast under the hood.