> You are saying that the corruption is established during the rule (before the change of power) but is more likely to be uncovered upon the change of power, co

> You are saying that the corruption is established during the rule (before the change of power) but is more likely to be uncovered upon the change of power, correct? Yes. In the corruption cases the involved party is the exiting one. As it loses power it can't keep the grip on the public officials and justice is free to work again. City councils are an extreme example, as they can hold power for decades. > As opposed to the corruption coming about because of the change of power, which is how I'm afraid some people could read your comment if they skim quickly. You are right. It's just that I found the concept so implausible that I didn't though about that misread. Thank you for the clarification.