4 ms·
It is not "complete bollocks",it just not as efficient as it appears to be. The reason for the (supposedly) higher efficiency of ternary logic is so called Radi
by IWeldMelons 9y ago
It is not "complete bollocks",it just not as efficient as it appears to be. The reason for the (supposedly) higher efficiency of ternary logic is so called Radix Economy (wikipedia has an article). Properly implemented ternary (with a split power supply - positive, negative and ground) would have the same noise immunity as binary.
- FullyFunctional 9y ago"It is not "complete bollocks",it just not as efficient as it appears to be." That's a contradictory statement. If it was as efficient as claimed it wouldn't be bollocks. But it isn't, thus, bollocks. "(with a split power supply - positive, negative and ground) would have the same noise immunity as binary." [citation needed] I'm not a EE, but my understanding from EE friends is that isn't true.
- ric2b 9y ago> Properly implemented ternary (with a split power supply - positive, negative and ground) would have the same noise immunity as binary. Only if you increase the supply voltage such that: V+tern - GNDtern == V+bin - GNDbin == GNDtern - V-tern