3 ms·
One party rule can still have different levels of checks and balances. Until recently, the power in China was divided between several people in the Standing Co
by _cs2017_ 9y ago
One party rule can still have different levels of checks and balances.
Until recently, the power in China was divided between several people in the Standing Committee, loosely organized into two factions. The two factions alternated every several years (not based on elections but just a pre-agreed schedule). This was intended to prevent the leader from doing something too crazy even by CCP standards, like say another cultural revolution.
Now there's no alternating between factions because there's only one faction left. And, the power of the Standing Committee is much weaker. Xi has much more power than any leader for the past couple decades.
The risk of some insane decisions by Xi is therefore much greater: it's a lot more difficult for the rest of the party to stop him.
Of course, if you think Xi is a good leader, who is likely to help make China more prosperous and a more enjoyable place to live in, it's possibly a good news. But even then you should be worried about succession: how to prevent some insane leader from taking control of all this power in the future?
- 8note 9y agowhenever that question gets brought up, I'm always confused why the laws allowing the leader excess power aren't written to expire when that leader loses power.
- varjag 9y agoConsider that this two term limit was a clause in constitution and is now being removed. Who is going to put them back, possibly decades after, and how are they going to enforce it? Let's say Xi has hypothetic son Xiao, a spoiled brat whom he's going to pass on the country in 2042. What are the chances that he'll be stopped by such a clause when he removed the terms limit in the first place?