3 ms·
Flip side would be: short term limits impose an artificiality low average experience on a given job and make for less effective leaders. There's obviously some
by alex_young 9y ago
Flip side would be: short term limits impose an artificiality low average experience on a given job and make for less effective leaders.
There's obviously some happy middle ground between a year or two and unlimited terms, but there are problems with both extremes.
- mturmon 9y agoYep, California instituted 2-term limits for most positions and it has basically meant that in the first term, they are learning the job, and in the next, they are often jockeying for their next gig, and not serving their current constituents. A 2-term limit on a position with a 2-year term can be pretty hard. A 2-term limit on a 4-year term is a different matter.