3 ms·
That's not true in general, I've been in environments where a team of 10+ very motivated individuals worked together without a manager. It's not common though.
by TomMarius 9y ago
That's not true in general, I've been in environments where a team of 10+ very motivated individuals worked together without a manager. It's not common though.
- the-pigeon 9y agoBut you still have people doing the job of a manager. Someone has to set meetings, someone has to call out issues, someone has to communicate with upper management and other teams. No-manager really means distributed management or an informal manager. Because the essential work a manager does has to be done by someone.
- mjw1007 9y agoSure, that work still has to be done. But if you start off by thinking of it as "the job of a manager" then you're assuming your conclusion.