4 ms·

And how productive do you think "voting with our wallets" can be for a product we don't pay for from a company with more money than all of us combined?

ocdtrekkie 9y ago
That's the problem with Google being the default search for almost all browsers and almost all phones: The entire tech industry could unite against Google, and Google still has literally billions of users who don't know better.
baddox 9y ago
Probably at least slightly more productive that literally voting in actual elections.
- Avshalom 9y ago
  If I had a solution I'd be telling you about it I assure you. I'm just saying that vote with your wallet and put your faith in the market is also not a solution in this case.
username223 9y ago
You're "voting with your data," which for a company like Google is essentially the same thing. If you don't hand them data, they can't monetize it.
- tscs37 9y ago
  Google auotmatically collects data on you the moment you visit and site with Google Analytics or a +1 button or when using Google Ads. Or using youtube. While it's certainly not totally impossible to vote with your data, you should remember that you are the product for google. The customers are advertisers. Not you.
mulmen 9y ago
You're right, we should just use Google for everything because they have money. All is lost. Thanks for opening my eyes, you have really made a positive impact. /s On a serious note I don't like the negativity in your comment and I don't think there is anything insightful about it. I believe the free market is based on individual actions. I will continue to choose services based on how well they serve my needs.
tekknik 9y ago
Some of us do/did pay for gmail. Also you could stop using Google all together as I have for this exact reason. (Specifically no way to disable AMP). I’ve been using bing/duckduckgo for search and icloud for email for a few years now. The only reason Google gets away with any of this crap is how many people refuse to switch to another service so yes voting with your wallet/wall clock will get results.

ocdtrekkie 9y ago

That's the problem with Google being the default search for almost all browsers and almost all phones: The entire tech industry could unite against Google, and Google still has literally billions of users who don't know better.

baddox 9y ago

Probably at least slightly more productive that literally voting in actual elections.

Avshalom 9y ago
If I had a solution I'd be telling you about it I assure you. I'm just saying that vote with your wallet and put your faith in the market is also not a solution in this case.

username223 9y ago

You're "voting with your data," which for a company like Google is essentially the same thing. If you don't hand them data, they can't monetize it.

tscs37 9y ago
Google auotmatically collects data on you the moment you visit and site with Google Analytics or a +1 button or when using Google Ads. Or using youtube. While it's certainly not totally impossible to vote with your data, you should remember that you are the product for google. The customers are advertisers. Not you.

mulmen 9y ago

You're right, we should just use Google for everything because they have money. All is lost. Thanks for opening my eyes, you have really made a positive impact. /s On a serious note I don't like the negativity in your comment and I don't think there is anything insightful about it. I believe the free market is based on individual actions. I will continue to choose services based on how well they serve my needs.

tekknik 9y ago

Some of us do/did pay for gmail. Also you could stop using Google all together as I have for this exact reason. (Specifically no way to disable AMP). I’ve been using bing/duckduckgo for search and icloud for email for a few years now. The only reason Google gets away with any of this crap is how many people refuse to switch to another service so yes voting with your wallet/wall clock will get results.