I do expect no one in the area to own a car. Cars only work in rural and suburban settings. Regarding your last paragraph, you basically just said this: https:

I do expect no one in the area to own a car. Cars only work in rural and suburban settings. Regarding your last paragraph, you basically just said this: https://i.redditmedia.com/ym0Xv9Jc_nVYFEsL6G5LPN07oziNzrU2ZFLCYkY63tA.png?w=503&s=890b3d5fe90703ad87b5fad5beff7ab4 https://i.redditmedia.com/ym0Xv9Jc_nVYFEsL6G5LPN07oziNzrU2ZF... There is no doubt that as more people move to a city, services have to scale up with them. San Francisco does have ample room to build more buildings. The article at the top demonstrates this. Cities can never be 'full'. No one in San Francisco is complaining that they can't get an appointment at a doctor's office. You are pulling that out of your behind. Under that logic, no cities would exist at all because they never would have been able to develop from detached single-story buildings. The fact that we do have some cities with at least medium sized buildings clearly demonstrate that your concerns about change are unfounded. Growing pains are inevitable and necessary.