5 ms·
I don't even think AMP is the problem. It feels more like an symptom. So the question really goes as: what's the actual problem? To keep it very short, it reall
by IlPeach 9y ago
I don't even think AMP is the problem. It feels more like an symptom. So the question really goes as: what's the actual problem? To keep it very short, it really does feel like to be around how the ad revenue works on the web. But maybe I'm just mistaken and I'm missing some pieces of the puzzle.
- Waterluvian 9y agoI think you're right that it's a symptom. Take a perfectly fine system like email and, from a profitability perspective, see a problem and an opportunity.
- hyder_m29 9y agoI don't think there's a problem. From what I gather, websites simply adopt AMP for the preferential treatment Google gives AMP pages. It's an SEO-hack.
- spc476 9y agoI think the problem is Google. Between Page Rank, QUIC, HTTP/2.0 and AMP, Google is pretty much now dictating the terms of the Internet. For instance, how much longer before Google only accepts email from the "Big Players?" (or drastically lowers the performance/acceptance of email from smaller sites?)