I get annoyed when companies that provide the "Next-Gen" of some kind of technology claim to be open for their systems to be attacked in an educational and cont

I get annoyed when companies that provide the "Next-Gen" of some kind of technology claim to be open for their systems to be attacked in an educational and controlled environment, but fail to do so. Specifically, this sentence: > Ribordy and Zavriyev stress that the open versions of their systems that are sold to university researchers are not the same as those sold for security purposes, which contain extra layers of protection. Granted, I can see how they would be unwilling to provide the same system to a school or university that they do to a company that pays them full price. They are a business. It sounds more like "Thank you Mario, but our princess is in another castle!"