3 ms·
It stood stuck at 0 for a while for me as well, before eventually updating. It's pretty crazy to see the amount of resources needed to load what is effectively
by simias 9y ago
It stood stuck at 0 for a while for me as well, before eventually updating. It's pretty crazy to see the amount of resources needed to load what is effectively a static page. I guess I shouldn't be too hard on a joke website but it's a bit symptomatic of the current state of the web these days.
- harryh 9y ago¯\_(ツ)_/¯ There is a TODO in there to calculate the timestamp based on the tweet id rather than digging through the tweet iframe after it loads. If someone wants to submit a pull request for that it should speed things up tremendously. Bitwise manipulations in JS are annoying though so I haven't bothered.