9 ms·
Cisco May Be Making A Run For Skype
- terryjsmith 16y agoOkay, so here's the new plan for startups: develop your product and execute it to near its full potential, then sell it to someone for $2B. But keep the core technology (just tell them it isn't important and/or you're just licensing it from this other corporation you just happen to own). Continue to collect licensing fees on said core tech. Then, when that person can't put enough time/effort/etc. into it, buy it back from them at 20% of the original price (after they've taken a huge write down of course). Next, raise a ron of VC money cause you're the shit, and then plan to IPO a very small portion of the company. Finally, while you're in the process of doing your IPO, get bought AGAIN, except for $5B this time. /rant
- bvi 16y agoThis would make for an interesting movie script.
- dcurtis 16y agoThis is almost exactly what actually happened with WebShots (only with smaller amounts of cash). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webshots http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Webshots
- rwmj 16y agoAfter doing a bit of contracting for Skype and eBay quite a few years ago, the problem was that eBay's management are a bunch of clueless goons. That they would get taken for a ride like this is no surprise to me at all.
- riffic 16y agoCisco owns Jabber, inc. Maybe they'll turn Skype into an xmpp-based service, allow federation with other service providers, and lose the proprietary protocols. or maybe not.
- rwmj 16y agoWhat possible benefit would this be to Cisco or Skype or even to Skype's current users?
- riffic 16y agoFederation would allow interoperability with other services. A user on Skype could communicate with users on other networks, such as Google Talk/Voice. Basically, freedom from being locked into a single service provider.
- rwmj 16y agoYou're saying that Skype should take a year or two off, rewrite all their software, and come back, safe in the knowledge they'll now be able to interoperate with a bunch of broken VoIP services that have no users. I can't see the killer business plan yet, sorry.
- riffic 16y agoI think they should be bought and shut down, simply for non-compliance with any written standard. Buildings that don't meet building codes get shut down and condemned.
- mdasen 16y ago
- mahmud 16y agoThe article should mention Webex, instead of leaving that for the fluff in the bottom. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebEx http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WebEx CISCO might want Skype just for the brand and userbase, since it already has a VOIP platform, far richer than Skype's (except maybe for the P2P stuff)
- signa11 16y ago> CISCO might want Skype just for the brand and userbase, since it already has a VOIP platform hmm, with at&t as well as verizon legally allowing skype on their networks, i think it is much more than that. also, with 4g (sic) lte networks ims voice seems to be a long way away... edit: at least one (high profile) cisco exec has moved into skype too.
- rwmj 16y agoWebEx is the most horrible user-hostile piece of software out there, so hopefully they'll kill it in favour of Skype.
- nailer 16y agoOne a remote desktop control tool, the other's a phone call app.
- nuclear_eclipse 16y agoWebEx Connect is still a frustrating piece of "Enterprise" software that I wish I wasn't forced to use on a daily basis.
- Osiris 16y agoThis acquisition certainly makes a hell of a lot more sense than the lame eBay purchase. Seriously, how did anyone convince the board at eBay that purchasing Skype would be a good thing? At least Cisco is in the telecommunications business and could roll the Skype brand and tech into real products.
- huhtenberg 16y agoI was in the same state of WTF until I asked about it a friend of mine, who was the CEO of one of larger Boston startups. It took him a couple of minutes to crunch the numbers in his MBA head and to show that eBay's purchase price was reasonable. Apparently it was a viable business transaction when it was conducted (excluding the not-purchasing-the-core-technology part).
- arethuza 16y agoOf course another possible explanation for this is that MBAs are all taught to value things the same (crazy) way and he is simply running the same valuation calculation as the MBAs at eBay and coming up with an equally crazy answer.