3 ms·
BMI is not meant as an individual health measure. It's a general population measure valid over a large sample size. 6'4" is a statistically rare height. I beli
by graeme 9y ago
BMI is not meant as an individual health measure. It's a general population measure valid over a large sample size.
6'4" is a statistically rare height. I believe BMI is less valid for the extremely tall and extremely short. That doesn't mean it isn't useful when viewing the whole population.
For an individual, BMI + a waist measure is a better indicator. Your brother probably isn't overweight, unless he has low muscle mass and a large waist - but that individual anecdote does nothing to argue against the population level validity of BMI.
- longerthoughts 9y ago>It's a general population measure valid over a large sample size This assumes a relatively symmetric distribution of heights and weights though, right? I'm curious if the tails for which BMI is individually invalid are equally populated. Basically, are short, fat people as common as tall, thin people?