To respond to the same question twice: You clearly imagine he/she gave that example in an effort to "rile people up", or are at least alluding to that as a str

To respond to the same question twice: You clearly imagine he/she gave that example in an effort to "rile people up", or are at least alluding to that as a strong possibility that others should consider. How you can come to that conclusion (out of an infinitude of hypotheticals) from the given information, I do not know. But to me, it may be a sign that you're looking for things that aren't there. I urge you to consider how in touch with reality you are.