3 ms·
Well "were" doesnt preclude "are". To say "are" however requires a whole set of other evidence much harder to obtain.
by mjburgess 9y ago
Well "were" doesnt preclude "are". To say "are" however requires a whole set of other evidence much harder to obtain.
- craftyguy 9y agoWhy do you think evolution has decided to stop with us after running for several billion years on at least one planet in the universe?
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- acomar 9y agoThat's not what they're saying. The point is that it's easier to say something about the past with the benefit of hindsight than to say something about on-going action. How would you prove that positive selection for these traits exists right now? What kind of evidence would that take?
- craftyguy 9y agoI see, yea I misunderstood. Thanks for the clarification.
- cryptonector 9y agoThe question is whether some specific genes are still being selected for, and the answer is not obvious, though it's a good bet that if they were, and if we're seeing a rise in incidence, then they are.