4 ms·
Sure, using your gut instinct in things like hiring, things where we want and need to be as objective as possible, is probably a recipe for bias and that's bad.
by mieseratte 9y ago
Sure, using your gut instinct in things like hiring, things where we want and need to be as objective as possible, is probably a recipe for bias and that's bad. Interviewing for roommates is something different, more intimate. You're going to be sharing space with this person and letting your gut reject someone is fine. If you're not comfortable having a female rommate, fine. If you're not comfortable with someone, for whatever reason, there is nothing morally or legally[0] wrong in rejecting them.
[0] - YMMV
- turc1656 9y agoI get what you're saying but I never understood why people make a distinction between doing it in your private life vs doing it on the job. Yes, I understand that it's more intimate and personal, as you mentioned. But why is it inherently more acceptable to do when, for example, finding a roommate? I mean a lot of us spend more time with coworkers than family. Is it simply because laws require business practices to not discriminate against protected classes? Or is there something more to this line of thinking? Like a moral justification for the personal case or something like that.
- jsl1212 9y agoWhen you're finding a roommate you have no obligation to be "fair" the way you do when hiring someone for a job--nor should you be. A roommate's compatibility with you isn't solely determined by their resume or any other traits that can be represented on paper, and it's a situation where personal safety is a legitimate concern. If you interview a potential roommate you have every right to trust your gut over their word or the word of their references.
- mieseratte 9y agoYou have a right to control you who live with, that's why.
- turc1656 9y agoSure, but doesn't an employer also have a right to decide to they want to have work for/with them?