1. had i said key details to the main story, yes, i'd agree 2. see my comment below, where i point out that, indeed the players and events that unfolded here a

1. had i said key details to the main story, yes, i'd agree 2. see my comment below, where i point out that, indeed the players and events that unfolded here are only proximal to not directly in the scope of the story about Jamison. 3. I already admitted there wasnt major inconsistencies, whaddayawant from me. A formal retraction?