> This is why we can't have good software. This program could literally have been an empty file, a nothing at all, a name capturing the essence perfectly. > But

> This is why we can't have good software. This program could literally have been an empty file, a nothing at all, a name capturing the essence perfectly. > But the inexorable forces of improvement dictate we can't accept that, so here we are: Keeping things as simple as possible is a bit of a losing battle.