`bind` is usually written as `>>=` in Haskell. Haskell also lets you write simply print instead of \d -> print d I wouldn't consider this part synt

`bind` is usually written as `>>=` in Haskell. Haskell also lets you write simply print instead of \d -> print d I wouldn't consider this part syntactic sugar – if one did, I suppose one would have to say that f(g()) in Python is sugar for (lambda i: f(i))((lambda: g())()) Here's how the desugared version looks in more idiomatic Haskell: getData >>= \a -> getMoreData a >>= getMoreData >>= getEvenMoreData a >>= print (where I kept the lambda around the first getMoreData since `a` was used in getEvenMoreData)