The entire ruling is very well worth a read. I'm not a lawyer, but these orders tend to read very much like code -- incredibly logical, with source-syntax (cas

The entire ruling is very well worth a read. I'm not a lawyer, but these orders tend to read very much like code -- incredibly logical, with source-syntax (case references) when referencing prior cases (both binding & persuasive). I'd guess this case settles though, far too much for Disney to lose and not enough for them to gain; I'd expect that they'll beef up their labeling. Unfortunately, the judge (and really, the existing case law) gives them basically a recipe to do what they want to: full license terms on the box top (via the referenced Lexmark case).