4 ms·
Great find! So, not exactly consistent with the NYT piece.
by dannylandau 9y ago
Great find! So, not exactly consistent with the NYT piece.
- subroutine 9y agoOddly not. Though, this Bachman guy was the direct cause of so much crazy stuff, I can hardly blame them for glossing over a proximal event (but wouldn't be surprised if he was somehow an instigator). If someone made a movie about this guy's life, I would watch. (also, just a trivial note, this is a NYMag piece, not NYT)
- ejstronge 9y ago> Great find! So, not exactly consistent with the NYT piece. First, this is not a NYT article. What do you think is inconsistent? The article tries to highlight the idea that ‘beheading’ was said rhetorically.
- subroutine 9y agoMaybe not 'inconsistent' so much as neglected to include the key details necessary to understand why Vidrine was acquitted (or, 'not indicted'). I mean, it's presented as a heinous murder. But yeah, you are right, after a second read there isn't major inconsistencies.
- JumpCrisscross 9y ago> neglected to include the key details The “key detail” is Bachman was close to a traumatic, seemingly-random violent interaction in his youth. Whether it was cheese snacks or a cheese sandwich, and who attacked whom first, are largely irrelevant to the main story.
- subroutine 9y ago1. had i said key details to the main story, yes, i'd agree 2. see my comment below, where i point out that, indeed the players and events that unfolded here are only proximal to not directly in the scope of the story about Jamison. 3. I already admitted there wasnt major inconsistencies, whaddayawant from me. A formal retraction?
- chmod775 9y ago"Suddenly, a man had appeared with a knife and slashed Gutzeit’s throat." According to the older news article Gutzeit grabbed the other Student, then got stabbed.
- tokai 9y agoThe "suddenly" is very disingenuous, when Gutzeit was the one that started the physical confrontation, and had provoked Vidrine just earlier.
- ghostbrainalpha 9y agoAre you serious??? The newspaper article says the student was eating a bag of cheese snacks, which is COMPLETELY different than a cheese sandwich! It's just NYMAG's liberal fake news 'sandwich hating agenda' peeking out again. Edit: I was trying to make a joke, but as a former assistant librarian I can tell you, there really is a difference between someone eating a sandwich, and someone thumbing through books with Cheetos fingers.