4 ms·
That is what i took out of the paper. I don't believe i was trying to summarize the paper from an objective standpoint. I guess i was trying to summarize how m
by callesgg 9y ago
That is what i took out of the paper.
I don't believe i was trying to summarize the paper from an objective standpoint. I guess i was trying to summarize how my interpretation did not lead to the same conclusion that you came to.
There are many hierarchy's some model the world better than others.
"To me this argument seems like a sophisticated way of telling someone that he/she is stupid."
Ok, what argument? Did you interpret my personal theory as an argument for something? I did not mean that it applies to you. I was expressing an idea that i thought was related to what we where talking to. Sorry.
- pasquinelli 9y agoto have a theory is to argue that such and such is the case. that's the sense of the word i took from gp's reply.
- edna314 9y ago> I was expressing an idea that i thought was related to what we where talking to. Sorry. Now I'm confused. How is your theory related to the article? And I would really love to discuss your theory itself as I already heard similar things before from somebody else in a discussion.
- callesgg 9y agoHow is your theory related to the article? Cause the article is about intelligence and i was describing something that i think is a key part of intelligence: "generalization". To achieve general intelligence one has to be good at generalizing.
- edna314 9y agoOk got it. Sorry for the misunderstanding.