3 ms·
>1. Who "started it" Not just who started. The quality and sophistication. > 2. How long they've been doing it 3. Percentage of people affected by it (not num
by PricelessValue 9y ago
>1. Who "started it"
Not just who started. The quality and sophistication.
> 2. How long they've been doing it 3. Percentage of people affected by it (not number!)
Yes. What else would it be? What other metric would you use?
- rconti 9y ago"Leading" implies, to me, sophistication, how widespread it is, and how many people it impacts.