2 ms·
Well, that's just part of the problem with the connected world. If you do something wrong it doesn't take machine learning or AI to find out, you just have to g
by tudelo 9y ago
Well, that's just part of the problem with the connected world. If you do something wrong it doesn't take machine learning or AI to find out, you just have to google it. Someone hiring you for a job will most likely do this anyways... I have had recruiters even call me out on such things. It has nothing to do with an algorithm.
It could be problematic if there was only one source of subjective information, especially if any perceived past transgressions were irredeemable. But if they are factual, do you have a problem with that? E.G, you go to hire somebody and find out that it's not recommended by hiring_hueristic_x based predominately on factors X,Y,Z (X being he stole from his past 10 employers, Y being he never held a job for more than 6 months, Z being he commonly posts serious threats about people he doesn't like online).
Also, do you have any idea what actually occurs when you make a decision? I don't. I would love to know someone who does. I still follow it.
- anfilt 9y agoDid I say I have a problem with people making a decision based off information. Problem is these AI systems will be making decisions and if everyone is only using a handful of vendors and there software just says bad canidate or gives you a low rating. The people are just going to default to that. What it boils down to is small number of systems making decisions. It turns into a small number making decision for many. Where as without the system it is decentralized and eveyone is making independent decisions. There also more room for nuance. Do think conpanies are going to develop there own AI and gather datasets on people just evalute potental hires. Train it for the requirements they feel is best for there company? No they are going to out source it. So what is likely going to happen is only small number of systems making these decisons.