5 ms·
I still don't understand what geological record this would set. Wouldn't the tree eventually die and have its remains scattered around the globe? How would this
by klez 9y ago
I still don't understand what geological record this would set. Wouldn't the tree eventually die and have its remains scattered around the globe? How would this preserve the radioactive elements in that spot?
Am I understanding geology and radioactivity wrong?
- Cthulhu_ 9y agoIt's just one source of mapping radioactivity and time; I'm sure you'd be able to find a similar trace pretty much everywhere. As the article points out, they saw a similar spike in research done in the northern hemisphere.
- maze-le 9y agoLets assume you are a geologist 100000 years from now. When you look at a drilling core you most certainly will be able to identify a strata, that is enriched with radionuclides (or fission products of radionuclides), that cannot be found deeper (earlier) in the core. >> Wouldn't the tree eventually die and have its remains scattered around the globe? Yes, thats exactly the thing, a lot of trees (and other biomatter) will die, and all of them will scatter their slightly more radioactive remains around the globe to create a layer as an imprint of the history of our planet.
- gypsy_boots 9y agoThis is a fantastic ELI5. Thank you