4 ms·
Go is not a language for "system-level features" in the first place. Its garbage collector largely precludes it from that in any modern context. I'm pretty sur
by quadcore 9y ago
Go is not a language for "system-level features" in the first place. Its garbage collector largely precludes it from that in any modern context.
I'm pretty sure I disagree with that largely because Go is low-level enough so that the GC is easily handled.
And users can't really fix it, because hey, no generics. Sigh.
Users can fix it by writing languages on top of Go (particularly dynamic ones).