10 ms·

In principle, yes. In reality, look at how they use their power. You don't see the US taking territory and resources at gunpoint from Mexico and Canada, like Ch

by eloff 9y ago

In principle, yes. In reality, look at how they use their power. You don't see the US taking territory and resources at gunpoint from Mexico and Canada, like China in the South China Sea. You don't see parallels to the Taiwan situation. Let's not pretend that communist China acts with the same level of integrity in the world as the USA. Not the the US hasn't done many questionable things, but by and large the US has invaded countries and brought them democracy and freed their people from dictators. China would do the opposite if they could get away with it, look at Nepal, Hong Kong. I spent 10 years in Panama, where although many people still resent the US invasion, chiefly over the loss of life - the country is unquestionably better off today for it.

arialeks 9y ago
As someone whose country was destroyed by the US and is still taking damage and being oppressed by them, I tend to disagree with your opinion, in fact both China and Russia have been way more helpful.
- reducesuffering 9y ago
  Could you elaborate more details on your country, what the US has done, and how China and Russia have been more helpful?
orijing 9y ago
Are you sure about that? I live in California, which was previously Mexican territory. I also have friends from Texas, which was also Mexican territory. Perhaps your point is that the US became less imperialistic since then, but that's easy to say once it's taken what it wants. China sees Taiwan as an integral part of the "Greater China", a still unresolved problem from the past century's wars. It sees the South China sea as its own backyard. Can you imagine the US response if China were sailing military vessels provocatively close to the cost of continental US? I'm not saying either is right. I'm pointing out that the US is not without its hypocrisies either, and that each country has its own flaws.
- eloff 9y ago
  That was hundreds of years ago when the world was a very different place. In a post WWII, post UN world, the standards for behavior for nation states are very, very different. The point I'm trying to make is the world has largely moved beyond that, but China still thinks it's ok to steal territory from it's neighbors. If the situation were reversed and Chinese vessels were patrolling in international waters in the Caribbean to dissuade the US from taking territory from it's neighbors there, I'd be cheering them on. That's not to say the USA doesn't do their fair share of despicable or hypocritical things, but by and large they have been a much better steward of power than China. I think the world will come to miss those days of American leadership in this century.
- TheCoelacanth 9y ago
  170 years ago. Hardly relevant now. At the time conquest was considered a legitimate way to acquire territory. That changed with the Kellogg-Briand Pact in 1928 and the UN Charter in 1945.
- khuey 9y ago
  > Can you imagine the US response if China were sailing military vessels provocatively close to the cost of continental US? Thankfully we don't have to imagine. https://thediplomat.com/2014/07/china-is-spying-on-rimpac/ https://thediplomat.com/2014/07/china-is-spying-on-rimpac/ "“It has not entered the territorial seas of the U.S. and it is in accordance with international law regarding freedom of navigation,” Capt. James said in a statement released to the Wall Street Journal. He explained that the ship was in Hawaii’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ). The U.S. maintains that freedom of navigation for all international ships extend to countries’ EEZs, and it has long maintained ships inside China’s EEZ."
- deleted 9y ago
  [deleted]
figjamjam 9y ago
The US is currently trying to start WWIII with Russia, the damage for this is yet to play out. The US installed a CIA backed dictator in Panama. When he stopped playing ball the US decided to use Panama as a cheap testing ground for their new weapons. Panamanians are mainly thankful for the canal and the fact they're not Columbian. Panama is great because it's a drug money laundering tax haven that's protected from serious international retribution by a ruling jewish elite. Which is why I live in Panama.
- eloff 9y ago
  You're remarkably off base on just about everything. I think the only thing you said which is correct is that Panamanians are thankful for the canal and to be independent of Columbia.
- matt4077 9y ago
  Flagged for gratuitous anti-semitism (to wit: neither the current, nor the former President are jewish)
  - figjamjam 9y ago
    I don't have any anti-semitic feelings towards the jews. The jews here make up ~10K of the 20K upper class and I live in Punta Pacifica which is a jewish area. I consider their influence to be instrumental for preventing many of the policies that have severely tarnished other Latin American countries.
matt4077 9y ago
I'd say the treatment of Cuba has some parallels to the Taiwan situation. And there have been many comments in recent months pointing out that China is actually acting with a lot more integrity on the international stage as the US with regards to, for example, the Paris Climate Treaty. With regards to Panama: let's not forget that the US actively supported Noriega until they changed their mind.
- eloff 9y ago
  Yes, all good points. Although I think (hope?) the policies of Trump are not representative of past or future US policy. Nobody, group, or nation is all good or bad, it's always somewhere on a slider between the two. China does many admirable things that the US would do well to follow. But I think it's also clear that the US ranks better on that sliding scale.
AnimalMuppet 9y ago
> You don't see the US taking territory and resources at gunpoint from Mexico... Not in this century. It happened, though. But I agree with your larger point. The US has not always been pure in how it used its power, but I don't trust China very far in terms of how it uses power. (Tibet, Vietnam, South China Sea, North Korea...)
yesenadam 9y ago
>You don't see the US taking territory..at gunpoint from Mexico >by and large the US has invaded countries and brought them democracy and freed their people from dictators Hahaha. I mean really. It's amazing that educated people can be brainwashed to believe this absolute nonsense. The first of those statements show, I don't know, breathtaking historical ignorance, or something, it's hard to explain otherwise. You don't see it because it already happened, long ago. The second is the official line heard in the US mainstream media and White House press statements etc. I was brought up believing it too. But it's very far from reality. It's been more usual since the 1890s for democracy, self-determination, refusal to submit obediently to US bullying, standing up to the US, to be the very reasons for invasion. It's thoroughly depressing to learn the history. It's the opposite of what you're told. The US has installed dictators, often military types given a load of US weapons. The US prefers dictators—whatever makes for docile 'stability' and exploitation by US business, and democracy is unpredictable, uncontrollable. Then, disgustingly, the US media is filled with stories of how it was all to bring democracy to a land threatened by communists, terrorists, instability etc. And more bilge about doing God's sacred work on earth etc. > the same level of integrity in the world as the USA hehehe. Ah I don't know if it's much use my saying this stuff to people on here. The reality is soooo different from what people in the US are taught to believe. So different that you'll feel physically sick when it starts to dawn on you.
- eloff 9y ago
  I'm not from the USA, nor am I ignorant of history. I used the present tense, because I'm talking of modern times. You cannot judge countries in the past by today's standards. Things were just different then. You also should not say that the US prefers dictators, I don't think that's ever been true. But sometimes they see it as the lesser evil when the populace would go against US interests - which is certainly hypocritical.
  - yesenadam 9y ago
    OK, sorry if some of my assumptions were incorrect. >sometimes they see it as the lesser evil when the populace would go against US interests So here democracy is 'the greater evil'. Countries have their own interests, the US has just often tried to stomp out any chance of other countries achieving theirs. If anyone tries to do the to the US it's met with moral outrage. Same with 'free markets'. Endless preaching them, actually it's the last thing corporations want.

by eloff 9y ago

arialeks 9y ago

As someone whose country was destroyed by the US and is still taking damage and being oppressed by them, I tend to disagree with your opinion, in fact both China and Russia have been way more helpful.

reducesuffering 9y ago
Could you elaborate more details on your country, what the US has done, and how China and Russia have been more helpful?

orijing 9y ago

Are you sure about that? I live in California, which was previously Mexican territory. I also have friends from Texas, which was also Mexican territory. Perhaps your point is that the US became less imperialistic since then, but that's easy to say once it's taken what it wants. China sees Taiwan as an integral part of the "Greater China", a still unresolved problem from the past century's wars. It sees the South China sea as its own backyard. Can you imagine the US response if China were sailing military vessels provocatively close to the cost of continental US? I'm not saying either is right. I'm pointing out that the US is not without its hypocrisies either, and that each country has its own flaws.

eloff 9y ago
That was hundreds of years ago when the world was a very different place. In a post WWII, post UN world, the standards for behavior for nation states are very, very different. The point I'm trying to make is the world has largely moved beyond that, but China still thinks it's ok to steal territory from it's neighbors. If the situation were reversed and Chinese vessels were patrolling in international waters in the Caribbean to dissuade the US from taking territory from it's neighbors there, I'd be cheering them on. That's not to say the USA doesn't do their fair share of despicable or hypocritical things, but by and large they have been a much better steward of power than China. I think the world will come to miss those days of American leadership in this century.
TheCoelacanth 9y ago
170 years ago. Hardly relevant now. At the time conquest was considered a legitimate way to acquire territory. That changed with the Kellogg-Briand Pact in 1928 and the UN Charter in 1945.
khuey 9y ago
> Can you imagine the US response if China were sailing military vessels provocatively close to the cost of continental US? Thankfully we don't have to imagine. https://thediplomat.com/2014/07/china-is-spying-on-rimpac/ https://thediplomat.com/2014/07/china-is-spying-on-rimpac/ "“It has not entered the territorial seas of the U.S. and it is in accordance with international law regarding freedom of navigation,” Capt. James said in a statement released to the Wall Street Journal. He explained that the ship was in Hawaii’s exclusive economic zone (EEZ). The U.S. maintains that freedom of navigation for all international ships extend to countries’ EEZs, and it has long maintained ships inside China’s EEZ."
deleted 9y ago
[deleted]

figjamjam 9y ago

The US is currently trying to start WWIII with Russia, the damage for this is yet to play out. The US installed a CIA backed dictator in Panama. When he stopped playing ball the US decided to use Panama as a cheap testing ground for their new weapons. Panamanians are mainly thankful for the canal and the fact they're not Columbian. Panama is great because it's a drug money laundering tax haven that's protected from serious international retribution by a ruling jewish elite. Which is why I live in Panama.

eloff 9y ago
You're remarkably off base on just about everything. I think the only thing you said which is correct is that Panamanians are thankful for the canal and to be independent of Columbia.
matt4077 9y ago
Flagged for gratuitous anti-semitism (to wit: neither the current, nor the former President are jewish)
- figjamjam 9y ago
  I don't have any anti-semitic feelings towards the jews. The jews here make up ~10K of the 20K upper class and I live in Punta Pacifica which is a jewish area. I consider their influence to be instrumental for preventing many of the policies that have severely tarnished other Latin American countries.

matt4077 9y ago

I'd say the treatment of Cuba has some parallels to the Taiwan situation. And there have been many comments in recent months pointing out that China is actually acting with a lot more integrity on the international stage as the US with regards to, for example, the Paris Climate Treaty. With regards to Panama: let's not forget that the US actively supported Noriega until they changed their mind.

eloff 9y ago
Yes, all good points. Although I think (hope?) the policies of Trump are not representative of past or future US policy. Nobody, group, or nation is all good or bad, it's always somewhere on a slider between the two. China does many admirable things that the US would do well to follow. But I think it's also clear that the US ranks better on that sliding scale.

AnimalMuppet 9y ago

> You don't see the US taking territory and resources at gunpoint from Mexico... Not in this century. It happened, though. But I agree with your larger point. The US has not always been pure in how it used its power, but I don't trust China very far in terms of how it uses power. (Tibet, Vietnam, South China Sea, North Korea...)

yesenadam 9y ago

>You don't see the US taking territory..at gunpoint from Mexico >by and large the US has invaded countries and brought them democracy and freed their people from dictators Hahaha. I mean really. It's amazing that educated people can be brainwashed to believe this absolute nonsense. The first of those statements show, I don't know, breathtaking historical ignorance, or something, it's hard to explain otherwise. You don't see it because it already happened, long ago. The second is the official line heard in the US mainstream media and White House press statements etc. I was brought up believing it too. But it's very far from reality. It's been more usual since the 1890s for democracy, self-determination, refusal to submit obediently to US bullying, standing up to the US, to be the very reasons for invasion. It's thoroughly depressing to learn the history. It's the opposite of what you're told. The US has installed dictators, often military types given a load of US weapons. The US prefers dictators—whatever makes for docile 'stability' and exploitation by US business, and democracy is unpredictable, uncontrollable. Then, disgustingly, the US media is filled with stories of how it was all to bring democracy to a land threatened by communists, terrorists, instability etc. And more bilge about doing God's sacred work on earth etc. > the same level of integrity in the world as the USA hehehe. Ah I don't know if it's much use my saying this stuff to people on here. The reality is soooo different from what people in the US are taught to believe. So different that you'll feel physically sick when it starts to dawn on you.

eloff 9y ago
I'm not from the USA, nor am I ignorant of history. I used the present tense, because I'm talking of modern times. You cannot judge countries in the past by today's standards. Things were just different then. You also should not say that the US prefers dictators, I don't think that's ever been true. But sometimes they see it as the lesser evil when the populace would go against US interests - which is certainly hypocritical.
- yesenadam 9y ago
  OK, sorry if some of my assumptions were incorrect. >sometimes they see it as the lesser evil when the populace would go against US interests So here democracy is 'the greater evil'. Countries have their own interests, the US has just often tried to stomp out any chance of other countries achieving theirs. If anyone tries to do the to the US it's met with moral outrage. Same with 'free markets'. Endless preaching them, actually it's the last thing corporations want.