I'm the one asking "Why?" in effect. I can't answer your question since it would be effectively answering my own. I think the Uber example in particular assume

I'm the one asking "Why?" in effect. I can't answer your question since it would be effectively answering my own. I think the Uber example in particular assumes that following laws is itself essential. But opposing immigration laws and enforcement of them undercuts that axiom. I don't see how people resolve the tension there in a philosophically coherent way.