8 ms·
Author here. I think you're picking a fight just to pick a fight. For example: > News to me that the number of interactors reflects the success of refactoring
by tonystubblebine 9y ago
Author here. I think you're picking a fight just to pick a fight.
For example:
> News to me that the number of interactors reflects the success of refactoring in a codebase.
In the context of the article, that was given as a proof of refactor as you go. The team chose a direction that they wanted to refactor towards. The 183 interactors are proof that they made significant progress in that direction without having to do any sort of full stops.
- meesterdude 9y agoI'm disagreeing with the article you wrote and the way you wrote it. It read of fluff and arrogance, and I tried to respond to the points I found most objectionable; I'll be honest there were more. But nobody wants to read all that. If my feedback was not constructive enough for you to improve your writing off of, I apologize. While I found what you wrote to be disagreeable, idealistic and in some cases downright toxic, it's only my perspective of the writing.
- tonystubblebine 9y agoI'm saying that I think you misread it. The example I gave flat out doesn't support your conclusion.
- meesterdude 9y agoWhy must my opinions be disregarded as picking a fight, or as a misread? You appear more intent to dismiss than understand. I've given my honest reaction to the article - that's the best I can do.