4 ms·

You are incorrect. Induction machines are often used as generators. My employer uses them almost exclusively in the generator configuration. The Lorentz force i

You are incorrect. Induction machines are often used as generators. My employer uses them almost exclusively in the generator configuration. The Lorentz force is symmetric; in the generator mode of operation the magnetizing flux vector leads the torque-producing current vector instead of lags, but the physics still works the same. The induction torque speed curve is also very performant even when compared to PM machines so I don’t understand your criticism. Source: motor control engineer.

raverbashing 9y ago
I stand corrected about not being able to use induction motors as generators, still As per wikipedia > An induction generator produces electrical power when its rotor is turned faster than the synchronous speed... An induction generator usually draws its excitation power from an electrical grid Which is not what they want in a car Also they do want good torque at zero speeds, while it can be done with induction motors it's not ideal
- smaddox 9y ago
  The Tesla roadster uses PM free induction motors: https://www.tesla.com/blog/induction-versus-dc-brushless-motors https://www.tesla.com/blog/induction-versus-dc-brushless-mot... According to the article, the torque limitations are only for a poorly controlled drive current.
  - raverbashing 9y ago
    Good article. And I quote: > Today, all the hybrids are powered by DC brushless drives, with no exceptions. The only notable uses of induction drives have been the General Motors EV-1; the AC Propulsion vehicles, including the tzero; and the Tesla Roadster. > Induction machines are more difficult to control. The control laws are more complex and difficult to understand. Achieving stability over the entire torque-speed range and over temperature is more difficult with induction than with DC brushless. This means added development costs, but likely little or no recurring costs. A hybrid has different characteristics and requirements from the motor than a purely electrical vehicle as well
- jabl 9y ago
  AFAIK practically all locomotives use induction motors, and those need massive torque at zero rpm. So it can certainly be done.
- vvanders 9y ago
  The Model S also uses an induction motor(s)[1] including power recovery via regenerative braking. [1] https://insideevs.com/video-primer-tesla-model-s-electric-motor/ https://insideevs.com/video-primer-tesla-model-s-electric-mo...
  - sunstone 9y ago
    Yes but apparently the Model 3 uses permanent magnet motors. I would be interested to see the detailed engineering trade offs between these two choices. https://www.reddit.com/r/teslamotors/comments/6strnb/model_3_permanent_magnet_vs_sx_induction_motors/ https://www.reddit.com/r/teslamotors/comments/6strnb/model_3... EDIT: Here's a bit of thought on why they might have switched technologies in the motor: https://www.edmunds.com/car-news/auto-industry/2017-tesla-model-3-has-unexpected-electric-motor-design.html https://www.edmunds.com/car-news/auto-industry/2017-tesla-mo...
    - sunstone 9y ago
      And for those joining in late here it is straight from the horse's mouth, the head of Tesla motor engineering on the trade offs: https://electrek.co/2018/02/27/tesla-model-3-motor-designer-permanent-magnet-motor/ https://electrek.co/2018/02/27/tesla-model-3-motor-designer-...
- stevendhansen 9y ago
  Yes, induction machines do draw power in order to establish a magnetic field where as PM machines get it for "free" by virtue of the magnets. Also the torque production at zero speed is almost identical in induction machines vs. PM machines, so this isn't an issue. For EV applications one of the cool things about induction machines is that they can actually achieve higher efficiency at high speeds than a PM machine. This is because at high speeds the spinning magnets in a PM machine induce losses (so called eddy-current and hysteresis losses) which are difficult to suppress. In an induction machine you are controlling the field directly so it can be weakened at higher speeds with a control loop to directly optimize the losses vs. torque production. This means that there is a trade-off speed at which an induction machine becomes more efficient than a comparable PM machine. To mitigate this issue in PMs some vehicle manufacturers have tried to do cool tricks like partially demagnetizing the magnets at high speeds to reduce losses, but this is very difficult to do without damaging the magnets permanently. Motor size is approximately proportional to torque, not power, so you can imagine a small, low torque induction machine that is fast and will have better efficiencies than a corresponding PM machine. In stop and go traffic or low speed travel the PM machine typically has better efficiencies. Personally I hope in the long run we end up with induction machines in our electric cars. 1) No safety issues with spinning magnets at high speed during an inverter failure, 2) no reliance on rare-earth materials, 3) the control of induction machines is very cool in its complexity and gives an additional degree of freedom on field flux that is only partially controllable in PM machines, and 4) induction machines have longer lifetimes as there is practically nothing to wear out aside from the bearings.
- jacquesm 9y ago
  > An induction generator produces electrical power when its rotor is turned faster than the synchronous speed... Yes, that's called overdriving the motor. >> An induction generator usually draws its excitation power from an electrical grid > Which is not what they want in a car You can generate very nice sine waves using modern electronics, tri-phase is also not a problem. > Also they do want good torque at zero speeds, while it can be done with induction motors it's not ideal Triphase motors have fantastic torque at zero speeds, see also every (diesel-)electric locomotive ever produced.
castratikron 9y ago
You can use an induction machine as a generator, but it has to be connected to the grid. It will generate reactive power. You need a rotor field to generate power. In a permanent magnet machine this field comes from the magnet, but in an induction machine this comes from the motion of the stator field (Lenz' Law). To maybe put it another way, there is no way to charge a dead battery with an induction machine.
- jacquesm 9y ago
  > You can use an induction machine as a generator, but it has to be connected to the grid. That's not true. > You need a rotor field to generate power. Residual magnetic field is enough to start the process, absent that a quick DC zap will do. > In a permanent magnet machine this field comes from the magnet, but in an induction machine this comes from the motion of the stator field (Lenz' Law). Yes. Fortunately rotors retain a bit of magnetism after you run them to a stop, which is enough to get things going again later on. > To maybe put it another way, there is no way to charge a dead battery with an induction machine. Yes there is, unless the induction machine is fresh from the factory and has never run at all.
  - castratikron 9y ago
    The rotors of induction machines are usually copper, which is not ferromagnetic and will not have any remanent magnetization. In practical terms it is not feasible to "bootstrap" an induction machine in the way that you describe.
    - jacquesm 9y ago
      You're simply wrong. Again. The rotor windings of induction machines are usually copper or aluminum, the stator windings are usually copper. As for the rotors and stators themselves, they are good old iron/steel laminates and will hold some magnetism just fine (they're laminates to cut down on the eddy currents). If the rotors themselves would be made out of copper the motor would not function at all, it needs a ferromagnetic part there to focus the field. Source: have done a number of induction motor to windmill conversions. Also: have you ever tried any of this or are you coming at this from a theoretical angle? Here is some good info for you: http://marineengineeringonline.com/tag/residual-magnetism/ http://marineengineeringonline.com/tag/residual-magnetism/

raverbashing 9y ago

I stand corrected about not being able to use induction motors as generators, still As per wikipedia > An induction generator produces electrical power when its rotor is turned faster than the synchronous speed... An induction generator usually draws its excitation power from an electrical grid Which is not what they want in a car Also they do want good torque at zero speeds, while it can be done with induction motors it's not ideal

smaddox 9y ago
The Tesla roadster uses PM free induction motors: https://www.tesla.com/blog/induction-versus-dc-brushless-motors https://www.tesla.com/blog/induction-versus-dc-brushless-mot... According to the article, the torque limitations are only for a poorly controlled drive current.
- raverbashing 9y ago
  Good article. And I quote: > Today, all the hybrids are powered by DC brushless drives, with no exceptions. The only notable uses of induction drives have been the General Motors EV-1; the AC Propulsion vehicles, including the tzero; and the Tesla Roadster. > Induction machines are more difficult to control. The control laws are more complex and difficult to understand. Achieving stability over the entire torque-speed range and over temperature is more difficult with induction than with DC brushless. This means added development costs, but likely little or no recurring costs. A hybrid has different characteristics and requirements from the motor than a purely electrical vehicle as well
jabl 9y ago
AFAIK practically all locomotives use induction motors, and those need massive torque at zero rpm. So it can certainly be done.
vvanders 9y ago
The Model S also uses an induction motor(s)[1] including power recovery via regenerative braking. [1] https://insideevs.com/video-primer-tesla-model-s-electric-motor/ https://insideevs.com/video-primer-tesla-model-s-electric-mo...
- sunstone 9y ago
  Yes but apparently the Model 3 uses permanent magnet motors. I would be interested to see the detailed engineering trade offs between these two choices. https://www.reddit.com/r/teslamotors/comments/6strnb/model_3_permanent_magnet_vs_sx_induction_motors/ https://www.reddit.com/r/teslamotors/comments/6strnb/model_3... EDIT: Here's a bit of thought on why they might have switched technologies in the motor: https://www.edmunds.com/car-news/auto-industry/2017-tesla-model-3-has-unexpected-electric-motor-design.html https://www.edmunds.com/car-news/auto-industry/2017-tesla-mo...
  - sunstone 9y ago
    And for those joining in late here it is straight from the horse's mouth, the head of Tesla motor engineering on the trade offs: https://electrek.co/2018/02/27/tesla-model-3-motor-designer-permanent-magnet-motor/ https://electrek.co/2018/02/27/tesla-model-3-motor-designer-...
stevendhansen 9y ago
Yes, induction machines do draw power in order to establish a magnetic field where as PM machines get it for "free" by virtue of the magnets. Also the torque production at zero speed is almost identical in induction machines vs. PM machines, so this isn't an issue. For EV applications one of the cool things about induction machines is that they can actually achieve higher efficiency at high speeds than a PM machine. This is because at high speeds the spinning magnets in a PM machine induce losses (so called eddy-current and hysteresis losses) which are difficult to suppress. In an induction machine you are controlling the field directly so it can be weakened at higher speeds with a control loop to directly optimize the losses vs. torque production. This means that there is a trade-off speed at which an induction machine becomes more efficient than a comparable PM machine. To mitigate this issue in PMs some vehicle manufacturers have tried to do cool tricks like partially demagnetizing the magnets at high speeds to reduce losses, but this is very difficult to do without damaging the magnets permanently. Motor size is approximately proportional to torque, not power, so you can imagine a small, low torque induction machine that is fast and will have better efficiencies than a corresponding PM machine. In stop and go traffic or low speed travel the PM machine typically has better efficiencies. Personally I hope in the long run we end up with induction machines in our electric cars. 1) No safety issues with spinning magnets at high speed during an inverter failure, 2) no reliance on rare-earth materials, 3) the control of induction machines is very cool in its complexity and gives an additional degree of freedom on field flux that is only partially controllable in PM machines, and 4) induction machines have longer lifetimes as there is practically nothing to wear out aside from the bearings.
jacquesm 9y ago
> An induction generator produces electrical power when its rotor is turned faster than the synchronous speed... Yes, that's called overdriving the motor. >> An induction generator usually draws its excitation power from an electrical grid > Which is not what they want in a car You can generate very nice sine waves using modern electronics, tri-phase is also not a problem. > Also they do want good torque at zero speeds, while it can be done with induction motors it's not ideal Triphase motors have fantastic torque at zero speeds, see also every (diesel-)electric locomotive ever produced.

castratikron 9y ago

You can use an induction machine as a generator, but it has to be connected to the grid. It will generate reactive power. You need a rotor field to generate power. In a permanent magnet machine this field comes from the magnet, but in an induction machine this comes from the motion of the stator field (Lenz' Law). To maybe put it another way, there is no way to charge a dead battery with an induction machine.

jacquesm 9y ago
> You can use an induction machine as a generator, but it has to be connected to the grid. That's not true. > You need a rotor field to generate power. Residual magnetic field is enough to start the process, absent that a quick DC zap will do. > In a permanent magnet machine this field comes from the magnet, but in an induction machine this comes from the motion of the stator field (Lenz' Law). Yes. Fortunately rotors retain a bit of magnetism after you run them to a stop, which is enough to get things going again later on. > To maybe put it another way, there is no way to charge a dead battery with an induction machine. Yes there is, unless the induction machine is fresh from the factory and has never run at all.
- castratikron 9y ago
  The rotors of induction machines are usually copper, which is not ferromagnetic and will not have any remanent magnetization. In practical terms it is not feasible to "bootstrap" an induction machine in the way that you describe.
  - jacquesm 9y ago
    You're simply wrong. Again. The rotor windings of induction machines are usually copper or aluminum, the stator windings are usually copper. As for the rotors and stators themselves, they are good old iron/steel laminates and will hold some magnetism just fine (they're laminates to cut down on the eddy currents). If the rotors themselves would be made out of copper the motor would not function at all, it needs a ferromagnetic part there to focus the field. Source: have done a number of induction motor to windmill conversions. Also: have you ever tried any of this or are you coming at this from a theoretical angle? Here is some good info for you: http://marineengineeringonline.com/tag/residual-magnetism/ http://marineengineeringonline.com/tag/residual-magnetism/