Google should be penalising the actual problem - page weight, not building their walled garden. So encouraging speed is ok to a point. Do they stop there and c

Google should be penalising the actual problem - page weight, not building their walled garden. So encouraging speed is ok to a point. Do they stop there and create AMP because Google is so invested in their ad ecosystem? Serious question, as it's hard not to feel cynical when the solution appears to avoid the actual problem. AMP seems a way of actively avoiding the issue. It's so far beyond ridiculous that a website downloads from 30 domains, and pulls down so much JS that you have more code than an entire 16 bit OS, GUI and game, just to see one text only page.