4 ms·
Where exactly does he discuss that? His entire point seems to be that aging is inevitable: > The constant risk is environmental (accidents, infectious disease)
by rowyourboat 9y ago
Where exactly does he discuss that? His entire point seems to be that aging is inevitable:
> The constant risk is environmental (accidents, infectious disease), but much of the exponentially increasing risk is due to internal wear.
... but as examples of negligible senescence show, that is simply not the case. This "exponentially increasing risk" is just not a given.
- saalweachter 9y agoThe author gets into it in the comments (which are now two years old at this point?).