3 ms·
The labels were insightful, interesting, informative, funny, overrated, underrated, redundant, troll, flamebait, offtopic, etc. Comments maxed out at +5. You co
by prawn 9y ago
The labels were insightful, interesting, informative, funny, overrated, underrated, redundant, troll, flamebait, offtopic, etc. Comments maxed out at +5. You could set a threshold so you'd only see +2 and higher, etc.
At some point, you could adjust your personal measure for the categories of positive or negative moderation. e.g., threads turned into boring rushes to post memes for +1 Funny, so at one point I made Funny worth zero and Insightful worth +2. It was an interesting way to influence how a thread appeared for you. But around that time, I lost interest in the site and quit it for HN.
You couldn't vote all the time (like on HN), but you periodically received 5 mod points to use, so you would tend to pick the most deserving to boost or demote.
From memory, periodically, you might get meta-moderation points. Say, 10 chances to assess whether a post's moderation was fair or unfair. It was half-chore, half-interesting so it was often a happy distraction.
More info for those with too much time on their hands:
https://slashdot.org/moderation.shtml
https://slashdot.org/faq/mod-metamod.shtml
- fnordsensei 9y agoInteresting, thank you both. I read up on online reputation systems a while back while consulting on a project, and it's been an interest since. This is a worthwhile video to watch on the subject if interested: http://buildingreputation.com/writings/2010/07/5_reputation_missteps_video_go.html http://buildingreputation.com/writings/2010/07/5_reputation_...