Fulltext: https://www.dropbox.com/s/cbpt3bw8ql310kr/2018-gardner.pdf?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/cbpt3bw8ql310kr/2018-gardner.pdf?d... Worth noting that the

Fulltext: https://www.dropbox.com/s/cbpt3bw8ql310kr/2018-gardner.pdf?dl=0 https://www.dropbox.com/s/cbpt3bw8ql310kr/2018-gardner.pdf?d... Worth noting that the genetics here was just 3 SNPs based on a 2010 candidate-gene study of apparently n=133 (it was never published, it's just a conference talk, based on the citation & description of the work in https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703862704575099742545274032 https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748703862704575099... ), which made the absolutely crazy claim that "those with a genetic predisposition to benefit from a low-carbohydrate diet lost 2 1/2 times as much weight as those on the same diet without the predisposition". So unfortunately, their total failure is exactly what you would predict from a non-GWAS-derived set of SNPs and the result is meaningless. This tells you nothing about whether SNPs can predict or cause more/less weight loss, be used to optimize diet choice, or have any cross-racial differences, despite people apparently interpreting it that way.