4 ms·

For those clicking on the Github link and getting an error, remove the . at the end. https://github.com/NVIDIA/FastPhotoStyle https://github.com/NVIDIA/FastPho

by Lerc 9y ago

For those clicking on the Github link and getting an error, remove the . at the end. https://github.com/NVIDIA/FastPhotoStyle https://github.com/NVIDIA/FastPhotoStyle

petercooper 9y ago
The above link is also good for seeing examples of the effect in action.
- schoen 9y ago
  It's strange that they used a Creative Commons license for software. https://creativecommons.org/faq/ https://creativecommons.org/faq/ "The only categories of works for which CC does not recommend its licenses are computer software and hardware." (although they seem to have taken on the FAQ section talking about this in more detail)
  - throwaway613834 9y ago
    Wow, I had no idea about this. I've used it on software before since it looks well-suited to software, and I suspect others are in the same boat. Thanks for mentioning this!
p1necone 9y ago
I notice on almost all of these image transformation projects the example images provided are usually very low res. It's basically impossible to judge how well this really works with the thumbnail sized images on the github page.
- yorwba 9y ago
  Why are small images not good enough to demonstrate how well this really works? What kind of issues would you expect to see for larger images?
  - virgilp 9y ago
    Visual artifacts are often visible only at higher resolutions. Take the first photo, as an example: wouldn't you be curious to see how the road looks at a higher resolution? From the thumbnail - it might as well be horrible/ unusable. Same thing about the clouds.
- hyperpallium 9y ago
  Seems to be a linked thumbnail. If you follow the link, github says: This file is too big to show. Sorry!
kazinator 9y ago
Style: "sentence with no punctuation" Content: "https://github.com/NVIDIA/FastPhotoStyle." https://github.com/NVIDIA/FastPhotoStyle." Stylized Content: "https//githubcom/NVIDIA/FastPhotoStyle" So friggin' close to realism! Damn ...

by Lerc 9y ago

For those clicking on the Github link and getting an error, remove the . at the end. https://github.com/NVIDIA/FastPhotoStyle https://github.com/NVIDIA/FastPhotoStyle

petercooper 9y ago

The above link is also good for seeing examples of the effect in action.

schoen 9y ago
It's strange that they used a Creative Commons license for software. https://creativecommons.org/faq/ https://creativecommons.org/faq/ "The only categories of works for which CC does not recommend its licenses are computer software and hardware." (although they seem to have taken on the FAQ section talking about this in more detail)
- throwaway613834 9y ago
  Wow, I had no idea about this. I've used it on software before since it looks well-suited to software, and I suspect others are in the same boat. Thanks for mentioning this!

p1necone 9y ago

I notice on almost all of these image transformation projects the example images provided are usually very low res. It's basically impossible to judge how well this really works with the thumbnail sized images on the github page.

yorwba 9y ago
Why are small images not good enough to demonstrate how well this really works? What kind of issues would you expect to see for larger images?
- virgilp 9y ago
  Visual artifacts are often visible only at higher resolutions. Take the first photo, as an example: wouldn't you be curious to see how the road looks at a higher resolution? From the thumbnail - it might as well be horrible/ unusable. Same thing about the clouds.
hyperpallium 9y ago
Seems to be a linked thumbnail. If you follow the link, github says: This file is too big to show. Sorry!

kazinator 9y ago

Style: "sentence with no punctuation" Content: "https://github.com/NVIDIA/FastPhotoStyle." https://github.com/NVIDIA/FastPhotoStyle." Stylized Content: "https//githubcom/NVIDIA/FastPhotoStyle" So friggin' close to realism! Damn ...