3 ms·
>Surely there's a middle ground here. LINQ. Monads that are easy to reason about without the need to speak about monads, functors and so on.
by gambler 9y ago
>Surely there's a middle ground here.
LINQ. Monads that are easy to reason about without the need to speak about monads, functors and so on.
- lmm 9y agoTo communicate we need names for things; "thing that has a suitably associative implementation of flatMap" is an important concept, and "Monad" is the name that exists for it.