4 ms·
I can't shake the feeling that Intel are trying to take credit for retpoline. They make no effort to credit the folk at Google who came up with retpoline. You h
by donaldihunter 9y ago
I can't shake the feeling that Intel are trying to take credit for retpoline. They make no effort to credit the folk at Google who came up with retpoline. You have to follow the reference in section 8 to infer that Google are the saviours here.
- jaydj 9y agoCredit goes to Google tech infra Software Engineer, Paul Turner who initially created the mitigation. Many CPU cycles have been saved! [iwork@google]
- hansendc 9y agoDisclaimer: I put a big chunk of that paper together. That definitely was not the intent! Getting retpoline to the place it is today took a ton of work from a ton of people, including the awesome folks at Google like Paul Turner, and countless people in the Linux community.
- mtgx 9y agoThey also did this with the ME bugs Positive Technologies found last fall. They made it sound as if their own investigation found the bugs, when they were given to them on a silver platter: > In response to issues identified by external researchers, Intel has performed an in-depth comprehensive security review of its Intel® Management Engine (ME), Intel® Trusted Execution Engine (TXE), and Intel® Server Platform Services (SPS) with the objective of enhancing firmware resilience. As a result, Intel has identified several security vulnerabilities that could potentially place impacted platforms at risk. Systems using ME Firmware versions 6.x/7.x/8.x/9.x/10.x//11.0/11.5/11.6/11.7/11.10/11.20, SPS Firmware version 4.0, and TXE version 3.0 are impacted. https://security-center.intel.com/advisory.aspx?intelid=INTEL-SA-00086&languageid=en-fr https://security-center.intel.com/advisory.aspx?intelid=INTE... And pretty much all of Intel's press releases surrounding Meltdown and Spectre have been almost as misleading, too, one way or another.