>Perhaps, but that does seem disruptive to business. It's sure supposed to be! > Woudn't testing product samples to ensure that they are what they claim to ve

>Perhaps, but that does seem disruptive to business. It's sure supposed to be! > Woudn't testing product samples to ensure that they are what they claim to ve (and nothing else) be enough? Experience has shown otherwise. Though random product QA testing is absolutely the first and normal line of defense, you need the fist, too. Actual plant shutdowns are rare, very costly, and normally get people's attention.