3 ms·
Perhaps, but that does seem disruptive to business. There probably needs to be better anti-fraud enforcement, but maybe there is a way to do it without shuttin
by ensignavenger 9y ago
Perhaps, but that does seem disruptive to business. There probably needs to be better anti-fraud enforcement, but maybe there is a way to do it without shutting down facilities just to conduct an audit. Woudn't testing product samples to ensure that they are what they claim to ve (and nothing else) be enough?
- hprotagonist 9y ago>Perhaps, but that does seem disruptive to business. It's sure supposed to be! > Woudn't testing product samples to ensure that they are what they claim to ve (and nothing else) be enough? Experience has shown otherwise. Though random product QA testing is absolutely the first and normal line of defense, you need the fist, too. Actual plant shutdowns are rare, very costly, and normally get people's attention.