4 ms·
>The entire Eastern system of medicine evolved based on shared experience and knowledge, and ample experience exists with many supplements to support their use.
by jimmies 9y ago
>The entire Eastern system of medicine evolved based on shared experience and knowledge, and ample experience exists with many supplements to support their use...
Oh -- you don't tell me the entire Western system of medicine evolved isn't based on shared experience and knowledge!
The difference is the Western system has a systematic way of filtering noises from anecdotal experiences. It's called science: One of the most important pillars is reproducibility. You need to know what the chances that something will work, how statistically significant the result of the method you propose is. Any of the ideas such as "eating roots and leaves," "expose it to X-rays," "pray to the Gods," "spit on it," "take supplements," "open it up and cut it with a sterile knife," "drinking rhino horn powder," method, at the beginning, can equally seem like great ideas -- and we should test them all.
But so far, some of the "take supplements" routes, as pointed out by the article, don't work way too well. The Eastern system, in general, doesn't work too well either. If it did, Eastern people with cancer wouldn't have to go through chemo.
- ci5er 9y agoThe Eastern thing worked for Steve Jobs! Oh, wait...
- crystaln 9y agoYes we do. That's very valuable sometimes. Often those studies are flawed or biased. In fact much of the time they are not even reproducible, or studies that don't support a patent holder's interests are discarded. Also thousands of years of knowledge and experience has yielded a lot fruit. Some of it is wrong for sure. Much of it too subtle and long term to fit into western trials. I suspect the error rate is comparable. Science is not the only path to knowledge and medical science is deeply flawed.