3 ms·
The conclusion of this article seems to directly contradict that company’s statement, while using the joining clause “in other words”. Seriously, go back and re
by ashelmire 9y ago
The conclusion of this article seems to directly contradict that company’s statement, while using the joining clause “in other words”. Seriously, go back and read that with some skepticism. This is obviously a hit piece with no journalistic integrity.
Some user downloaded an illegal copy that had malware and is trying to blame the company, when that malware doesn’t appear for legitimate copies. Don’t want malware? Don’t steal software hat could have been tampered with.
- mavdi 9y agoErm from what I'm reading it sure looks like they included what is practically a trojan in their software that only got activated when a pirated copy was detected. Obviously exposing their users to a whole set of new security attack surface.
- Nicksil 9y agoThe malware was included within every installation and supposedly deleted only after a legitimate software key was installed thereafter. So, regardless of whether you pirated the software, it was indeed installed on your system without your consent.