>Articles like these are there to simply confuse the reader. What makes you say that? Why do you think Gary Taubes is a better source than the authors of this

>Articles like these are there to simply confuse the reader. What makes you say that? Why do you think Gary Taubes is a better source than the authors of this article? I haven't a strong opinion on the subject but if you think the article is purposefully misleading I would be very interested to know why and how.