3 ms·
To be truely useful as a diagnostic in major decision-making, it needs to be 90-95%+ accurate. But unfortunately there isn't anything close to this yet. High
by graeham 9y ago
To be truely useful as a diagnostic in major decision-making, it needs to be 90-95%+ accurate.
But unfortunately there isn't anything close to this yet.
High blood pressure, for example, probably more accurate than the retinal image technique here. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25632496 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25632496
The major goal here would be to screen for people to go for a more advanced test, like an MRI. But even that wouldn't hit the 90-95% level of predictor.