2 ms·
Is that actually clear? New York has a much higher percentage of homeless people per square mile yet it doesn’t feel as problematic because more of them are sh
by RobLach 9y ago
Is that actually clear?
New York has a much higher percentage of homeless people per square mile yet it doesn’t feel as problematic because more of them are sheltered.
According to HUD ~88% of SF’s homeless population is unsheltered whole only ~5% of New York’s is despite having more per square mile.
San Francisco is more willing to leave this demographic on the streets so it’s more of a issue of policy, and a bad one at that:
To feed / house / and provide essential medical care to a homeless person costs about $28000 / year according to a study by Pomeroy in Canada while HUD claims the cost to the tax payer for a homeless person is $40,000+ particularly because their only medical assistance is typically the emergency room. Why there is a homeless problem at all is something we should all consider.
- freyir 9y ago> San Francisco is more willing to leave this demographic on the streets Maybe because the possibility of having thousands of homeless people freeze to death overnight in the streets isn't a perennial threat.